Skip to content
Siddharth Shukla Office
  • HOME
  • About the Office
  • Blog
  • Internship
  • Contact
  • HOME
  • About the Office
  • Blog
  • Internship
  • Contact
  • Property Ejectment and Power of Attorney Judgment Jabbar Khan case
    Analysis,  Case Updates

    The Criticality of Registering Power of Attorney in Property Sales

    January 28, 2026

    Connect with Siddharth Shukla Advocate, Madhya Pradesh High Court Follow Siddharth Shukla on X Advocate, Madhya Pradesh High Court On January 23, 2026, the High Court of Madhya Pradesh delivered a judgment in the case of Jabbar Khan vs. Rajendra Kumar Jaiswal. The court upheld a 2002 Trial Court judgment that dismissed a claim for property ejectment due to a…

    Read More
    Siddharth Shukla Office
  • Analysis,  Madhya Pradesh High Court

    The “Security Cheque” Defense: High Court Reinstates Conviction in Loan Default Case

    January 27, 2026

    Connect with Siddharth Shukla, Advocate Legal Insights The Madhya Pradesh High Court recently addressed whether a cheque issued as “security” for a loan exempts a borrower from criminal liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments (N.I.) Act. In the case of Ramesh Kumar Mehra vs. Anand Malviya, the Court overturned an acquittal, ruling that a security cheque matures into…

    Read More
    Siddharth Shukla Office
  • MP High Court judgment summary on MPPSC recruitment deadline and document submission cut-off
    Madhya Pradesh High Court

    MPPSC Recruitment Deadlines Are Not “Technicalities”: Indore Bench Refuses to Revive Candidature After Cut-Off

    January 24, 2026

    Recruitment litigation ex facie may look deceptively trite: a candidate clears the written exam, appears in the merit list, and then loses out because of a “procedural” lapse: late document submission, a missed upload, or a delayed verification. The question courts repeatedly face is whether such lapses can be cured later, especially when the candidate appears meritorious and the default…

    Read More
    Siddharth Shukla Office
  • Case Updates,  Legal,  Madhya Pradesh High Court

    Order 41 Rule 21 CPC: When can an ex-parte appeal be reheard?

    January 17, 2026

    The Madhya Pradesh High Court’s order dated 15 January 2026 in MCC No. 2808 of 2025 (Dayaram @ Dayla (Deceased) through LRs Anter Singh & Ors. v. Smt. Raju Bai & Ors.) is not a decision on land rights, partition, or succession in the usual sense. It is, instead, a decision about something more foundational: the integrity of hearing itself,…

    Read More
    Siddharth Shukla Office
  • Case Updates,  Legal,  Madhya Pradesh High Court

    Will, Mutation & Sale Deed Set Aside: MP High Court Upholds Heirs’ Rights Over Disputed Land (FA No. 833/2000 in MP High Court at Jabalpur)

    January 16, 2026

    The Madhya Pradesh High Court at Jabalpur, in First Appeal No. 833/2000, decided on 15 January 2026, upheld a trial court decree that cancelled a disputed Will and the transactions based on it. The case involved a conflict between the legal heirs of a deceased landowner and persons claiming title through a Will and a subsequent sale deed. Background of…

    Read More
    Siddharth Shukla Office
  • Illustration showing Supreme Court of India, judge’s gavel, eviction notice, police-assisted eviction, and a highlighted 6-month deadline, representing the mandate that eviction decrees must be executed within six months.
    Case Updates,  Madhya Pradesh High Court

    Execution of Eviction Decrees Must Finish in 6 Months: Supreme Court & High Court Mandate

    January 14, 2026

    The enforcement of eviction decrees has long been plagued by delays that undermine the very purpose of judicial relief. Addressing this systemic issue, the High Court of Madhya Pradesh has issued a decisive mandate requiring executing courts to conclude eviction proceedings within six months, except in exceptional circumstances recorded in writing. Reinforced by Supreme Court jurisprudence, this ruling marks a…

    Read More
    Siddharth Shukla Office
2026 Siddharth Shukla Office © Disclaimer: As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, advocates are prohibited from soliciting work or advertising. By accessing this website, you acknowledge that you are seeking information of your own accord and that there has been no form of solicitation or inducement by Siddharth Shukla Office. The content of this website is for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as legal advice. An advocate-client relationship is not created by accessing this site.
Savona Theme by Optima Themes